Charting Banking III: funding
by PlanMaestro
A bank’s liabilities are its assets, and its assets are its liabilities – David Merkel’s clever old boss
I am a sucker for paradoxes because they stretch our linear thinking. Before any accountant starts complaining that I should get back to school, let’s give David Merkel the opportunity to explain what that means
Banks that focus on their deposit franchises have something of real value — that is hard to replicate. But any bank can invest their funds aggressively, which will lead to defaults with higher frequency. It is true of insurers as well, most financials die from bad investing policies, and short-term liabilities that require complacent funding markets – David Merkel
Deposits are a sticky funding source and is critical for banks; institutions that for the most part are lending long term with short term borrowings. Deposits in a sense have become long term borrowing and in time of crisis they can make a difference. That was not always the case but FDIC insurance, consequence of the Great Depression, changed the rules of the game. So most modern run on the banks are consequence of the drying up of wholesale funding sources like the Northern Rock case.
So here is a chart from a Citizens Republic Bancorp presentation, a bank that I do own, that tackles this risk of funding sources. Some would argue that instead of equity you should use tangible equity and that instead of total assets you should use tangible assets; you might want to do those adjustments.
Long CRBC

Interesting observation. I am assuming you like CRBC because of its low ratio of price to tangible book value and stabilizing trends on its loans? But at first glance, my concerns here are that the bank is dependent on Michigan economy (not poised for growth soon) and low net interest margins.
Check out PFBI though – stable dividend, positive net income, and a clean loan portfolio. It has recently run-up after the last reported results included their recent acquisitions. But still worth a look. Let me know your thoughts.
Will take a look at PFBI. I like also about recent insider buying, deposits growing double digits in Michigan (!), reserves as high as the NPAs, and recent talk about starting to release reserves this year. Checked the loan book and I think they are conservative.
Hi PlanMaestro,
From the latest 10K, CRBC seem to have over 7% nonperforming loans/total loans. I remember a post in Jae’s forum you replied to me that if a bank’s nonperformer is over 6%, it is life threatening, so I am a bit confused here. I know that for CRBC, the alowance/NPA is over 50%, which is pretty good, so how do you weigh these factors and decided that CRBC is financially safe?
Thanks,
Zehua
I look at non performing assets/assets, that includes the very important OREO category. I use the 6% as a fast filter, there are 7%+ that will survive but they need very strong reserves and capital ratios to avoid a dilution. ANother important thing to measure is the TREND. I want NPAs declining and 30-90 days delinquencies (that is early warning of potential future NPA problems if it is advancing) declining too.
Thank you, PlanMaestro. Your comments reminds me of IBCA, which I looked at last month when it was $4, and p/b only like 20%. My impression was that the management is extremely frank. They basically disclosed every single NPA commercial loan status in their 10K. My only concerns are allowance/loan losses only 20%, and NPA/total loan is over 6%, but has been declining steadily since early 2009. I didn’t buy because that was the first regional bank I looked at, and over 6% of NPA scared me away. Now it is over $6.5 now, I am not sure if it is still cheap.
What is OREO? I seemed to have seen this in some bank’s 10K, but couldn’t remember.
So regarding CRBC, given its NPA is over 7%, did you buy because of high allowance/NPA?
OREO: Other Real Estate Owned, foreclosed properties owned by financial institutions
CRBC: Nonperforming assets as a percent of total assets is 4.91% and good allowances
IBCA you have to go loan by loan. I think CRE is overblown but I would still be worried with 67% of my loans in that category
I see. I though we filter with NPA/total loan > 6%. Looks like my perception is wrong.
CRBC’s structural liquidity is good, with low taxes ratio and good allowance/NPA, and its current price/book is slightly above 50%. I really like the massive insider buys. Do you consider it as still cheap? Is there any other virtues that make you pull the trigger?
Thank you!
I still consider CRBC cheap, several Qs of declining NPAs/delinquencies, a large % of CRE by owner occupied and insider buying by the CEO settled the issue.
What tools are using to filter? I am getting a different number for price to book
They have 394 M shares. Share holder equity is 1,331 M, minus preferred 271 M, goodwill 330 M and other intangibles 14 M, gets to $1.82 per share book value.
In addition, could you please tell me what “Securities held to maturity, at amortized cost” means? What is amortized cost? Does it mean that they purchased these bonds at that price? Since their notes says its all US backed bonds, I won’t discount on these securities.
How do you find out that their CRE are owner occupied? You mean owners use their own CRE to open offices and run businesses?
[...] was mentioned in passing a couple of times including one with other financials for January effect picks. I remember that one of those picks [...]